Skip to main content

Azure Static Web App - Bring your own API

As a follow-up on the presentation I did at CloudBrew about Azure Static Web Apps I want to write a series of blog posts.

In the last post in this series, I explained that with every Static Web App you get a serverless API endpoint (based on Azure Functions) for free. However you have also the option to bring your own API. This can be an Azure Function but also an API exposed through Azure API Management, an Azure App Service or Azure Container Apps.

The advantage of using this feature is that you get:

In this post I’ll show you how to do this and I’ll use Azure Container Apps to demonstrate it.

The Azure Container App

I already created the Azure Container App(ACA) in Visual Studio and deployed it to Azure. Most important is that the ACA exposes an API listening on the /api endpoint.

As I mentioned I deployed the ACA. I didn’t add any authentication or authorization so right now anyone can call this api.

Linking our API

Next step is to link the API to our Azure Static Web App. Therefore we go to our Static Web App in the Azure Portal and click on the APIs section:

To link an API we need to click on the Link hyperlink next to the environment.

Remark: The link option will only be available when Azure Static Web App has detected that no existing Managed Function is found inside your source repository.

On the Link new Backend screen, we can select a Resource Type and select the Resource itself. Click on Link to complete the process.

You can see that the 'withoutapi' environment is now linked to our Azure Container App:

Now our ACA API is no longer directly accessible but can only be called through our Azure Static Web App. 

If you go to the ACA resource in the Azure Portal, you can see that an Azure Static Web App is used as the Identity Provider.

Calling the API

To call our API we first need to make sure that a corresponding route is configured in our staticwebapp.config.json file:

Once that is done, we can invoke the API through our frontend code:

More information

Overview of API support in Azure Static Web Apps | Microsoft Learn

Bring your own functions to Azure Static Web Apps | Microsoft Learn

 

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...