Skip to main content

NuGet– Offline support

With big traffic jams everywhere, I try to use public transport as much as possible for my daily commute. This allows me to work already before I arrive at the office. As connectivity is not that great during travel, I tend to work offline. Most of the time this works great, but I get into trouble the moment I need to add or update a NuGet package to a project in Visual Studio.

Visual Studio starts to complain when connectivity is lost and I want to add a NuGet Package:


Of course, this is not related to Visual Studio directly, if I try do this from the command line, I also get errors:

The stupid thing is that I do have the package available offline. If you go to %userprofile%\.nuget\packages, you’ll find a local copy of every package you have installed in your projects:

Instead of failing back to the cache when the package source is not accessible, it just fails.

Local feeds

What you can do, is setup a local feed. This will use a simple hierarchical folder structure on your file system to store packages. 

To use a local folder as source, add its pathname (such as d:\packages) to the list of sources using the Package Manager UI or the nuget sources command

Just to test I added one package to the local feed:

This create a nested folder structure on disk:

If I now try to use this package source in Visual Studio, our installed package is found:

 

The .nuget folder as the local feed?

This made me wonder, could I use the local nuget cache as the source folder for our local feed?

I created a new package source and specified the %userprofile%\.nuget\packages folder as the source folder.

I could already discover the packages, that is a good start:

Also search seems to work although it is quite slow:

And even install does what it is supposed to do:

Remark: Although I was able to install offline packages this way, I still got NuGet errors for the other packages but that didn’t prevent me to successfully  build the solution. 

Another thing I noticed, is that for the SDKs another local feed is available:

I took a look at the configured folder and found a lot of framework related packages:


Interesting. Is anyone using this as an offline approach?

More information

Setting up Local NuGet Feeds | Microsoft Learn

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...