Skip to main content

An architect is not an evangelist

A trap I easily fall in to as an architect is that I can be become quite enthusiastic about a specific technology. If you are a long time reader of my blog, you certainly have seen me write about specific tools, techniques and products over the years.

Unfortunately this enthusiasm got me into trouble a few times as an architect. Because I have an important stake into a project and some influential power it happened that I started spreading this enthusiasm and influenced the team to join my enthusiasm. Sorry team!

But this means that I was no longer doing my job as an architect. Instead of seeing the trade-offs ; I fell in love with the good parts and turned blind for the bad parts. Although I know better and that I should  be wary of any tool or technique that promises to make everything better, I couldn’t resist.

It's a trap that many architects fall into: becoming so enamored with the positive aspects of a technology that they overlook its shortcomings. In doing so, we neglect our primary duty as architects – to carefully consider the trade-offs inherent in any decision. Instead of objectively evaluating options, we become enamored with the promises of a new tool or technique, ignoring the potential pitfalls

 


Of course, it's essential to leverage our existing knowledge and draw upon lessons learned from past experiences. However, we must also remain vigilant, continually reassessing our decisions within the specific context of each project. What worked well in one scenario may not necessarily be the best choice for another.

As architects, we must strike a delicate balance between innovation and pragmatism. While it's natural to be drawn to the allure of new technologies, we must temper our enthusiasm with a critical eye. By acknowledging the trade-offs and evaluating options thoughtfully, we can ensure that our decisions align with the needs and objectives of the project at hand.

I conclude with a quote from the Software Architecture – The hard parts book:

An architect adds real value to an organization not by chasing silver bullet after silver bullet but rather by honing their skills at analyzing the trade-offs as they appear.

Amen!

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Kubernetes–Limit your environmental impact

Reducing the carbon footprint and CO2 emission of our (cloud) workloads, is a responsibility of all of us. If you are running a Kubernetes cluster, have a look at Kube-Green . kube-green is a simple Kubernetes operator that automatically shuts down (some of) your pods when you don't need them. A single pod produces about 11 Kg CO2eq per year( here the calculation). Reason enough to give it a try! Installing kube-green in your cluster The easiest way to install the operator in your cluster is through kubectl. We first need to install a cert-manager: kubectl apply -f https://github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager/releases/download/v1.14.5/cert-manager.yaml Remark: Wait a minute before you continue as it can take some time before the cert-manager is up & running inside your cluster. Now we can install the kube-green operator: kubectl apply -f https://github.com/kube-green/kube-green/releases/latest/download/kube-green.yaml Now in the namespace where we want t...

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...