Skip to main content

Using parameters in BenchmarkDotNet

Most of the code I write is library code aimed to help other developers be more productive. As a consequence, a lot of this code is part of the critical path of an application and is execute a lot. This means that performance is critical. To measure the impact of a code change, I like to use BenchmarkDotNet, a powerful library for benchmarking .NET code.

When of the benchmark tests I got was to compare the impact between logging enabled and disabled.

I removed most the implementation in the code above but what is important is that the implementation of both benchmark methods was completely the same with only the addition of an EnableLogging() call as a difference.

An alternative(read better) way to implement this, is by using parameters. I added an extra property IsLoggingEnabled and specified the values using the [Params] attribute:

The benchmark is run for every combination of parameters you’ve provided and nicely visualized in the results:

// * Summary *

BenchmarkDotNet v0.13.10, Windows 10 (10.0.19044.4046/21H2/November2021Update) (Hyper-V)
Intel Xeon Gold 6154 CPU 3.00GHz, 1 CPU, 4 logical and 4 physical cores
.NET SDK 8.0.101
  [Host]     : .NET 8.0.1 (8.0.123.58001), X64 RyuJIT AVX2
  DefaultJob : .NET 8.0.1 (8.0.123.58001), X64 RyuJIT AVX2


| Method      | IsLoggingEnabled | Mean      | Error     | StdDev     | Gen0       | Gen1     | Allocated |
|------------ |----------------- |----------:|----------:|-----------:|-----------:|---------:|----------:|
| GetProducts | False            |  91.78 ms |  1.830 ms |   3.481 ms |   750.0000 | 250.0000 |   9.65 MB |
| GetProducts | True             | 345.69 ms | 58.352 ms | 172.051 ms | 29333.3333 |        - | 362.61 MB |

If you need more values or want to generate them dynamically, you can also use [ParamsSource]. You need to specify the name of a public method or property that provides the values (implementing IEnumerable). The source must be within the benchmarked type:

More information

Parameterization | BenchmarkDotNet

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...