Skip to main content

Model based testing in C#

In my continuous journey to design and write better code I try and experiment with multiple testing techniques. A while ago I wrote a whole series of blog posts about Property based testing, an addition to the traditional example-based testing.

A property based test is meant to be fairly succinct and verify that simple properties hold true for all possible inputs given a set of preconditions. Libraries like FSCheck and CSCheck by randomizing the inputs for a particular operation.

But what if we need to test a more complicated scenario where it is not so easy to identify the separate properties of our system? This is where model based testing can help us. Instead of randomizing the input for one operation, we execute an arbitrary combination of operations against our system and compare it to a simplified model.

Let me show you how to do this using CsCheck.

I have created a small Counter with two operations: Increase() and Decrease():

We now define a “simplified” model based on our mental model on how we think the system should work:

Remark: The example I using is quite contrived  as the real “complex” system and the “simplified” model are in this case the same.

Now we need to specify a list of operations that can be executed in arbitrary combinations:

The last step is configure CSCheck to execute the operations against both the real system and  the model and compare the results.

As you can see the test fails because there is a difference between how the real system and the model handles negative values:

The full example can be found here: wullemsb/modelbasedtesting: A small example demonstrating how to use model based testing with CSCheck (github.com)

For a more realistic example using FsCheck, check out this blog post by Arron Stannard:

https://aaronstannard.com/fscheck-property-testing-csharp-part2/

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...