As more as I’m motivating my teams to adopt and integrate GitHub Copilot in their development processes, the more I get push back with reasons why they cannot use it. This resistance often stems from misconceptions rather than Copilot's actual limitations. In this post, I'll address three common misconceptions I've encountered and share strategies for overcoming them. Misconception 1: "Copilot produces low-quality and insecure code" One of the most persistent concerns I hear is that Copilot generates code that's either functionally deficient or contains security vulnerabilities. While it's true that Copilot isn't perfect, this concern often overestimates the risks while underestimating both Copilot's capabilities and the developer's role in the process: Copilot isn't designed to replace code review or testing practices The tool works best as a pair-programming assistant, not an autonomous coder Recent studies show that d...