As more as I’m motivating my teams to adopt and integrate GitHub Copilot in their development processes, the more I get push back with reasons why they cannot use it. This resistance often stems from misconceptions rather than Copilot's actual limitations. In this post, I'll address three common misconceptions I've encountered and share strategies for overcoming them.
Misconception 1: "Copilot produces low-quality and insecure code"
One of the most persistent concerns I hear is that Copilot generates code that's either functionally deficient or contains security vulnerabilities.
While it's true that Copilot isn't perfect, this concern often overestimates the risks while underestimating both Copilot's capabilities and the developer's role in the process:
- Copilot isn't designed to replace code review or testing practices
- The tool works best as a pair-programming assistant, not an autonomous coder
- Recent studies show that developers using Copilot actually complete tasks with fewer security vulnerabilities compared to those not using AI assistance. In case that possible vulnerabilities are still identified in suggested or generated code, Copilot gives a clear warning:
To address this, I would recommend to
- Experiment with different models: Copilot gives you access to a wide range of models. Experiment and try different models to compare the results. I noticed big differences in the quality of the result depending on the context and model used. (Github Copilot–New models added)
- Give the model context: Finetune your Copilot experience by providing specific instructions that takes your specific context into account. Our own experiments showed a major increase in acceptance of the suggestions after taking the time to define a good set of instructions. (GitHub Copilot - Custom Instructions)
Misconception 2: "Using Copilot creates Intellectual Property and licensing risks"
Many teams worry that code generated by Copilot might inadvertently incorporate copyrighted code or create legal complications around ownership.
GitHub has significantly evolved Copilot's approach to IP concerns, offers IP indemnification and doesn't use your private code to train the model when using Copilot for Business.
Copilot actively gives you warning
If you want to further minimize the risk, you can
- Block suggestions matching public code: Copilot includes an option to either allow or block code suggestions that match publicly available code. If you choose to block suggestions matching public code, GitHub Copilot will check potential code suggestions and the surrounding code of about 150 characters against public code on GitHub. If there is a match, or a near match, the suggestion is not shown. (GitHub Copilot–Code referencing)
- Use content exclusions: You can use content exclusions to configure Copilot to ignore certain files. When you exclude content from Copilot, content of the affected files will not be used in any way in Copilot.
Remark: There is still a general discussion going on if these language models are trained on IP protected content.
Misconception 3: "Learning to use Copilot takes too much time"
This one I hear the most. Some developers resist Copilot because they believe the learning curve will slow them down initially, negating any potential productivity gains.
While there is a learning curve with any new tool, Copilot's adoption doesn't require a steep learning curve. The basic functionality works out-of-the-box with minimal configuration (It is just autocomplete on steroids).
Some things we did that helped:
- Develop a library of prompts: Setup your own repository of example prompts or provide a default prompt in your repo (GitHub Copilot– Reusable prompts files).
- Create a Copilot newsletter: Share and demonstrate new features on a regular basis through short tutorial videos or documentation showing specific examples of how Copilot can help with your codebase.
More information
Github Copilot–New models added
GitHub Copilot–Code referencing