Skip to main content

ConfigureAwaitOptions in .NET 8

If you have ever used async/await in C#, you probably also used the ConfigureAwait method. In this post I want you to show how this method got some enhancements in .NET 8. But before I do that let's first recap the original behavior (just in case you forgot).

Understanding ConfigureAwait in .NET

The ConfigureAwait method in .NET plays a crucial role when awaiting tasks. It allows developers to configure how asynchronous operations resume after completion. Specifically, it determines whether the continuation should happen on the original captured context or on an available thread pool thread.

Original ConfigureAwait Behavior

When you await a task (such as Task, Task<T>, ValueTask, or ValueTask<T>), the default behavior is to capture a “context.” This context is either SynchronizationContext.Current or TaskScheduler.Current (falling back to the thread pool context if none is provided). The async method then resumes execution in that context when the task completes.

You could originally use the ConfigureAwait in two ways:

  • ConfigureAwait(true): This explicitly continues on the captured context.
  • ConfigureAwait(false): Useful when you don’t want to resume on the captured context. It allows the async method to resume on any available thread pool thread.

ConfigureAwait(false) was typically used in library code because a library author could not make any assumptions on how the code would be consumed but you should generally avoid it in application code..

With improvements like dropping SynchronizationContext in ASP.NET Core, there has been a move away from ConfigureAwait(false).

Still there are some places where this method can be useful and with .NET 8,a new type ConfigureAwaitOptions is added that provides all the different ways to configure awaitables:

  • None: No specific configuration Equivalent to ConfigureAwait(false)..
  • ContinueOnCapturedContext: Equivalent to ConfigureAwait(true).
  • SuppressThrowing: Suppresses exceptions during await.
  • ForceYielding: Forces the await to always behave asynchronously

Developers can now fine-tune their await behavior using these options. Whether you’re building libraries or applications, understanding and leveraging ConfigureAwaitOptions will empower you to write more efficient and context-aware asynchronous code.

For more details, I would recommend to check out Stephen Cleary’s insightful blog post on ConfigureAwait in .NET 8

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

The role of ActivitySource in OpenTelemetry for .NET

While doing some pair programming to integrate OpenTelemetry tracing to a .NET application, we had a discussion on how to use the ActivitySource . It looks simple. You new one up, give it a name, start an activity, done. The discussion started when we added a second ActivitySource with the exact same name in a different class. This made us wonder: "Are we duplicating traces now? Is this a memory leak? Do we need a singleton?" So we decided to dig deeper. This post is what we learned… What ActivitySource actually is ActivitySource is part of System.Diagnostics , not part of the OpenTelemetry NuGet packages. Microsoft built tracing primitives directly into the BCL, and OpenTelemetry's .NET SDK simply listens to them. This is why you can add distributed tracing to a library without taking a dependency on OpenTelemetry at all. An ActivitySource is a factory for Activity objects, and an Activity is .NET's name for what OpenTelemetry calls a span.(don’t ask m...