Skip to main content

Everyone should be an architect

In the world of software development, the role of the architect often looms large. Yet, what if I told you that architecture is not just the domain of a select few, but rather the responsibility of every member on the team?

Let's delve into why this shift in perspective is crucial for the success of your projects.

Gone are the days when software architecture was solely the concern of a designated architect. In today's landscape, it's imperative that every team member, from developers to testers, possesses a solid understanding of the architectural principles guiding their work.

As an architect, your primary aim should be to ensure that everyone comprehends the architecture as thoroughly as you do. Each member should be equipped to answer the fundamental "why" questions about the architecture, breaking down barriers that often lead to miscommunication and inefficiency.

Too often, we see organizations where the architect stands as the solitary guardian of the system's architecture. This isolation not only stifles collaboration but also hinders the development team's ability to fully grasp the architectural vision.

The result?

Ivory tower architects struggling to bridge the gap between their ideas and the practical realities faced by developers.

 


Imagine a scenario where every developer possesses architecture skills. Communication becomes streamlined, with team members adeptly navigating discussions around architecture models and design decisions. They're empowered to align their work with overarching architectural goals, making informed choices that uphold the desired quality attributes of the system.

Furthermore, developers, being intimately familiar with the codebase, serve as invaluable sources of insight for architects. Even seemingly minor details in the code can have profound architectural implications, underscoring the importance of a collaborative approach to architecture.

In this paradigm, developers understand when to adhere to the established architecture and when to advocate for necessary changes. By fostering a culture of shared ownership over architecture, teams can navigate the inevitable challenges of software development with agility and confidence.

So let's challenge the notion that architecture is the sole purview of architects. To design and build better software we’ll have to embrace a collective mindset where every team member plays a pivotal role in shaping and maintaining the architectural integrity of your software.

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...