Skip to main content

Azure Static Web App - Authentication using pre-configured providers

As a follow-up on the presentation I did at CloudBrew about Azure Static Web Apps I want to write a series of blog posts.

I ended 2023 with a post about protecting access to your Azure Static Web App using a password. Of course this is a poor man’s implementation of security. So let us have a look today on how to properly integrate authentication in our Azure Static Web App.

Authentication in itself is a broad topic, we can further refine it in 2 parts:

  • Who are you? The real authentication part
  • What are you allowed to do? This is more a question of authorization instead of authentication

Let us focus on the first question in this post. To allow a Static Web App to know who you are we need to integrate with an authentication provider. 

Pre-configuration authentication providers

Azure Static Web Apps comes with 2 pre-configured authentication providers:

  • Github
  • Azure Active Directory (Microsoft Entra ID)

Remark: Originally there was also a pre-configured provider for Twitter(X) but this got removed. 

To authenticate against one of the preconfigured providers you need to browse to a specific endpoint:

Then I embedded this in my navigation component:

Authorization Provider Endpoint
Microsoft Entra ID /.auth/login/aad
Github /.auth/login/github

Both providers are enabled by default. If you want to disable one of them you need to do this by blocking access to this endpoint through the staticwebapps.json.config file:

Next to the built-in providers, it is also possible to configure one or more custom providers but I’ll leave that for a later post.

Authenticating

To authenticate, you need to send the user to one of the above endpoints. Here is an example on how I did this in an Angular application:

I first created a login component that renders a link for a specific authentication provider:

This renders a (simple) UI that looks like this:


When clicking on a specific authentication provider the user is redirected and is requested to authenticate against the selected provider:

After being authenticated we can receive the user information by sending a GET request to the /.auth/me endpoint. This will return a JSON object like the following:

In my Angular app I added some extra logic to call this endpoint and receive the user info:

More information

Authenticate and authorize Static Web Apps | Microsoft Learn

Accessing user information in Azure Static Web Apps | Microsoft Learn

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...