Skip to main content

Azure Static Web App–Deploying to multiple environments

As a follow-up on the presentation I did at CloudBrew about Azure Static Web Apps I want to write a series of blog posts.

So far we have deployed our application to one environment, the production environment. Your custom domain points to this environment, and content served from this location is indexed by search engines.

However it is possible to use 3 other types of (staging) environments:

  • Pull requests: Pull requests against your production branch deploy to a temporary environment that disappears after the pull request is closed. The URL for this environment includes the PR number as a suffix. For example, if you make your first PR, the preview location looks something like <DEFAULT_HOST_NAME>-1.<LOCATION>.azurestaticapps.net.

  • Branch: You can optionally configure your site to deploy every change made to branches that aren't a production branch. This preview deployment is published at a stable URL that includes the branch name. For example, if the branch is named dev, then the environment is available at a location like <DEFAULT_HOST_NAME>-dev.<LOCATION>.azurestaticapps.net.

  • Named environment: You can configure your pipeline to deploy all changes to a named environment. This preview deployment is published at a stable URL that includes the environment name. For example, if the deployment environment is named release, then the environment is available at a location like <DEFAULT_HOST_NAME>-release.<LOCATION>.azurestaticapps.net.

Remark: If you are using the Free plan, you are limited to 3 staging environments. The Standard plan gives you 10 staging environments.

Before we can start using staging environments, we need to update our Github Actions workflow and explicitly specify our production environment in the static-web-apps-deploy step:

Now we can specify a PR trigger to create a PR environment:

Or add extra branches that should result in extra environments:

Remark: If you want to create an environment for every branch, you can specify “**” instead of the list of branch names

It is also possible to deploy to a specific named environment, therefore you need to specify the deployment_environment value in the static-web-apps-deploy step:

You can watch the list of deployed environments in the Azure Portal:


More information

Preview environments in Azure Static Web Apps | Microsoft Learn

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...
Read more

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.
Read more

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...
Read more