Skip to main content

Azure Static Web App–Traffic splitting

As a follow-up on the presentation I did at CloudBrew about Azure Static Web Apps I want to write a series of blog posts.

Yesterday I talked about limiting access to your staging environment by password protecting it. This allows you to work with a limited set of test users who can access the staging environment(assuming they got the visitor password).

However sometimes you want to do something like a canary deployment where we redirect a small subset of your users in production to a new version of your application.

This is something that is also possible in Azure Static Web Apps through the concept of Traffic splitting. To activate this feature go to your Azure static web app resource in the Azure portal:

  • Go to Environments.


  • Choose Traffic splitting at the top. This will open the Traffic splitting pane.

  • There we can add an extra environment by clicking Add. We need to select an environment and specify the amount of traffic that should be redirected to this environment.

  • Click Save to commit your changes.

Now a part of our users will go to the Production environment where some will end up on our PR environment.

Remark: To avoid strange behavior returning traffic will always go to the same environment.

If I now open 2 browser windows and browse to the production URL, we get two different pages(notice the difference in the title):

 

I wondered what would happen if I tried to combine this feature with the password protection I showed yesterday…

When I selected the Protect both staging and production environment option, I got the password request. When I  selected the Protect staging environments only option, I got to see the PR environment. This makes sense I think as a part of our production traffic is redirect behind the scenes.  I still cannot directly access the PR environment without providing the password.

More information

Traffic Splitting in Azure Static Web Apps (preview) | Microsoft Learn

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...
Read more

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...
Read more

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...
Read more