Skip to main content

Batching work in SQL Server

In one of our ASP.NET Core applications, I added a new feature to cleanup old data. My implementation was simple and used a BackgroundService to run a cleanup script on periodic intervals:

All worked fine during development and testing, but when I deployed it to production it brought the whole application to a halt.

What was happening?

First, as this was the first time the script was run on production, there was a lot of old data. So while the query executed and completed quite fast on other environments, on production it impacted millions of rows.

What made the problem even worse is that the table that should be cleaned up contained a large amount of binary data. This made the transaction log grow in size and further increased the query duration.

My first attempt to improve the performance of this query was to delete the data based on the primary key. A suggestion I found here: How to Delete Large Amounts of Data – SQLServerCentral

However the impact of this change was minimal and the query still timed out.

I had not enough time to find a solution that allowed me to fix the issue at the application level. So I ‘hacked’ together a solution where I executed the query in small batches:

Using the query above the delete is executed in small batches of 100 rows with an interval of 1 second between every batch.

The total query execution time is still long but at least my application & database remained accessible during the execution.

Anyone with a suggestion for a better solution?

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

The role of ActivitySource in OpenTelemetry for .NET

While doing some pair programming to integrate OpenTelemetry tracing to a .NET application, we had a discussion on how to use the ActivitySource . It looks simple. You new one up, give it a name, start an activity, done. The discussion started when we added a second ActivitySource with the exact same name in a different class. This made us wonder: "Are we duplicating traces now? Is this a memory leak? Do we need a singleton?" So we decided to dig deeper. This post is what we learned… What ActivitySource actually is ActivitySource is part of System.Diagnostics , not part of the OpenTelemetry NuGet packages. Microsoft built tracing primitives directly into the BCL, and OpenTelemetry's .NET SDK simply listens to them. This is why you can add distributed tracing to a library without taking a dependency on OpenTelemetry at all. An ActivitySource is a factory for Activity objects, and an Activity is .NET's name for what OpenTelemetry calls a span.(don’t ask m...