Skip to main content

Implementing the decorator pattern using System. Reflection.DispatchProxy

If you are new to the decorator pattern, let me start with a short explanation:

Decorator is a structural design pattern that lets you attach new behaviors to objects by placing these objects inside special wrapper objects that contain the behaviors.

A common use case for decorators is to implement Aspect Oriented Programming(AOP) which allows you to implement cross-cutting concerns like logging, caching, …

There are multiple ways to implement this pattern, you can manually implement it, use your DI container, use a source generator to write the boilerplate code or use a dynamic proxy that wraps call to the original class.

It’s this last approach I want to focus on in this blog post. You could use the great  Castle.DynamicProxy library but for simpler use cases, there is a built-in alternative through the System.Reflection.DispatchProxy class.

Let’s have a look at a small code example on how to use this class.

First we need to create a Decorator class that implements DispatchProxy:

Remark: Be aware that we cannot use constructor injection to inject parameters(like the logger in the example above).

We could now use the DispatchProxy.Create() method but I typically create a static method that allows me to wrap an existing class instance

Let's create an interface, corresponding class and apply the decorator:

If we now run this code, the result looks like this:

 

Sweet!

There are some pros and cons when using this approach:

  • Pros
    • Works with .NET Standard 1.3+ (so it works with both .NET Framework 4.6+ and .NET Core/.NET 5).
    • No 3th party libraries needed.
    • Proxies by wrapping the target object, so a proxy can be created around an already existing object.
  • Cons
    • Proxies interfaces, not classes, so proxied types must implement an interface and access to any members not in the interface (like fields) is complicated.
    • Uses reflection, so not usable with AOT.
    • No support for async methods/functions.

More information

DispatchProxy Class (System.Reflection) | Microsoft Learn

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...