Skip to main content

EF Core - Cannot convert from 'string' to 'System.FormattableString'

While doing a pair programming session with a new developer in one of my teams, we ended up with a compiler error after writing the following code:

This is the error message we got:

Argument 2: cannot convert from 'string' to 'System.FormattableString' 

The fix was easy just add a ‘$’ before the query:

However it would not have been a good pair programming session if we didn’t drill down further into this.

What is a FormattableString?

A FormattableString in C# is a type introduced in .NET 4.6. It represents a composite format string, which consists of fixed text intermixed with indexed placeholders (format items). These placeholders correspond to the objects in a list. The key features of FormattableString are:

  1. Capturing Information Before Formatting:

    • A FormattableString captures both the format string (similar to what you’d pass to string.Format, e.g., "Hello, {0}") and the arguments that would be used to format it.
    • Crucially, this information is captured before actual formatting occurs.
  2. Adjustable Formatting:

    • You can adjust the formatting behavior of a FormattableString, such as performing formatting in the invariant culture.
    • This is useful when you want to control how the string is formatted without actually performing the formatting immediately.
  3. Usage with Interpolated Strings:

    • When you use an interpolated string (e.g., $"Hello, {name}"), the compiler will create a FormattableString if you assign it to an IFormattable variable.
    • The IFormattable.ToString(string, CultureInfo) implementation of the interpolated string will use FormattableString

The last key feature explains why adding a ‘$’ sign and creating an interpolated string fixes the compiler error.

FormattableString and EF Core

But that doesn’t explain yet why the EF Core team decided to expect a FormattableString instead of a ‘normal’ string when calling the FromSql() method.

The reason a FormattableString is expected is because it helps you to safe guard against SQL injection, as they integrate parameter data as separate SQL parameters.

Let's have a look at the following example:

Although the query above looks like regular C# string interpolation, the categoryId value is wrapped in a DbParameter and the generated parameter name inserted where the placeholder was specified.

This is the query that got executed in the database:

This makes FromSql safe from SQL injection attacks, and sends the value efficiently and correctly to the database.

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...