Skip to main content

RabbitMQ–Using Alternate Exchanges to avoid loosing messages

A few days ago I blogged about a situation we had where some messages send to RabbitMQ got lost. I showed a possible solution when using MassTransit. We further investigated the issue and a colleague(thanks Stijn!) suggested another solution by using a specific RabbitMQ feature: Alternate Exchanges.

The documentation explains the feature like this:

It is sometimes desirable to let clients handle messages that an exchange was unable to route (i.e. either because there were no bound queues or no matching bindings). Typical examples of this are

  • detecting when clients accidentally or maliciously publish messages that cannot be routed
  • "or else" routing semantics where some messages are handled specially and the rest by a generic handler

Alternate Exchange ("AE") is a feature that addresses these use cases.

Whenever an exchange with a configured AE cannot route a message to any queue, it publishes the message to the specified AE instead. If that AE does not exist then a warning is logged. If an AE cannot route a message, it in turn publishes the message to its AE, if it has one configured. This process continues until either the message is successfully routed, the end of the chain of AEs is reached, or an AE is encountered which has already attempted to route the message.

That is exactly the kind of problem we had, so Alternate Exchanges sounds like the perfect solution for us.

You can specify an alternate exchange through the MassTransit configuration:

However the recommended way to configure this is through RabbitMQ policies. When using a policy we specify a pattern(through a regex) to define when the policy should apply and the exact rules of the policy.

Policies can be created directly from the commandline:

rabbitmqctl set_policy AE "^my-direct$" '{"alternate-exchange":"my-ae"}' --apply-to exchanges

Or through the Management plugin:

  • Go to the Management UI of your RabbitMQ cluster
  • Click on Policies on the right

  • Go to the Add / update a policy section. Specify a name, a regex pattern, the scope it should apply to and add one or more definitions. In our case we choose the Alternate exchange and specify the name of our exchange.
  • Click on Add / update policy to save the policy.
  • Now for every exchange that is created that matches the pattern an alternate-exchange is automatically configured.

That’s it!

More information

Parameters and Policies — RabbitMQ

Alternate Exchanges — RabbitMQ

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...