Skip to main content

Implement the mediator pattern using MassTransit

The mediator pattern is a behavioral design pattern used in software engineering. It defines an object that encapsulates how a set of objects interact

In object-oriented programming, programs often consist of many classes. As more classes are added to a program, especially during maintenance or refactoring, the problem of communication between these classes becomes complex. Direct communication between objects can lead to tight coupling, making the program harder to read, maintain, and change.

The mediator pattern introduces a mediator object that acts as an intermediary between interacting objects. Instead of direct communication, objects now communicate through the mediator. This reduces dependencies between objects and promotes loose coupling.

A popular way to implement the mediator pattern in .NET is through the popular MediatR library. But if you are already using Masstransit,  there is no need to introduce an extra dependency as Masstransit has built-in support for the Mediator pattern.

Similar to MediatR, the MassTransit mediator runs in-process and in-memory. The nice thing is that it builds further on the concepts you already use in MassTransit, like consumers, handlers, sagas, …

Let me show you a quick example on how to get started.

Configure our Mediator pipeline

First we should create a Consumer, we could implement the default IConsumer interface or the MediatorRequestHandler that further simplifies the implementation when using the MassTransit mediator:

We'll use the MediatorRequestHandler in this example:

Now we need to register this handler:

A typical reason to use the mediator pattern is to isolate specific behavior in separate classes. In MassTransit we can use the middleware feature for this. We first need to create our filter:

And then we can configure to apply this filter in our mediator pipeline:

Send a request through the Mediator

Now the configuration is done, the only thing left to do is to send a request through the pipeline. This can be done by injecting an IMediator instance and calling the SendRequest method:

More information

Mediator · MassTransit

MassTransit/Sample-Mediator: A sample solution with various projects showing how to use MassTransit's mediator (github.com)

jbogard/MediatR: Simple, unambitious mediator implementation in .NET (github.com)

Also have a look at the following video:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...