Skip to main content

Applying the decorator pattern in .NET Core using Castle.DynamicProxy

In this post I want to explain what the decorator pattern is, why it is useful and how you can implement it in a generic way using Castle.DynamicProxy.

What is the Decorator pattern?

Before we dive into the technical details, let us start with a recap about what the decorator pattern actually is:

Decorator is a structural design pattern that lets you attach new behaviors to objects by placing these objects inside special wrapper objects that contain the behaviors.

There are a lot of use cases where the decorator pattern can help, in this blog post I focus on one of them; using a decorator to handle cross cutting concerns(caching, error handling, logging, …) without polluting your original object.

I’ll show you an example where I introduce caching at the repository interface level.

How to integrate the decorator pattern in a generic way?

You don’t need a special library or anything to implement the decorator pattern in C#. However I would like to write it in a generic way without the need to create the same decorator over and over again for different interfaces. Therefore I will use Castle.DynamicProxy. It allows me to create lightweight .NET proxies on the fly at runtime. These proxy objects allow calls to members of an object to be intercepted without modifying the code of the class. These interception points are the perfect place to introduce our caching behavior.

We’ll start by creating our cache interceptor using Castle.DynamicProxy:

This interceptor only calls our async cache interceptor that contains the real caching logic:

In this async interceptor we use an IMemoryCache instance to cache the data and use the intercepted method name together with the method arguments to construct the cache key. This guarantees that when our method is called with different arguments the correct values are returned.

We register these interceptors in the DI container and also register the ProxyGenerator singleton that is responsible for the proxy generation:

The last step is to write the logic that wraps the object we want to create in the proxy and plugin our interceptor. As I want to do this in a generic way I have created extension methods on IServiceCollection:

There is only one thing left to do, we call one of this extension methods to register the object that should be proxied:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...