Skip to main content

Applying the decorator pattern in .NET Core using Castle.DynamicProxy

In this post I want to explain what the decorator pattern is, why it is useful and how you can implement it in a generic way using Castle.DynamicProxy.

What is the Decorator pattern?

Before we dive into the technical details, let us start with a recap about what the decorator pattern actually is:

Decorator is a structural design pattern that lets you attach new behaviors to objects by placing these objects inside special wrapper objects that contain the behaviors.

There are a lot of use cases where the decorator pattern can help, in this blog post I focus on one of them; using a decorator to handle cross cutting concerns(caching, error handling, logging, …) without polluting your original object.

I’ll show you an example where I introduce caching at the repository interface level.

How to integrate the decorator pattern in a generic way?

You don’t need a special library or anything to implement the decorator pattern in C#. However I would like to write it in a generic way without the need to create the same decorator over and over again for different interfaces. Therefore I will use Castle.DynamicProxy. It allows me to create lightweight .NET proxies on the fly at runtime. These proxy objects allow calls to members of an object to be intercepted without modifying the code of the class. These interception points are the perfect place to introduce our caching behavior.

We’ll start by creating our cache interceptor using Castle.DynamicProxy:

This interceptor only calls our async cache interceptor that contains the real caching logic:

In this async interceptor we use an IMemoryCache instance to cache the data and use the intercepted method name together with the method arguments to construct the cache key. This guarantees that when our method is called with different arguments the correct values are returned.

We register these interceptors in the DI container and also register the ProxyGenerator singleton that is responsible for the proxy generation:

The last step is to write the logic that wraps the object we want to create in the proxy and plugin our interceptor. As I want to do this in a generic way I have created extension methods on IServiceCollection:

There is only one thing left to do, we call one of this extension methods to register the object that should be proxied:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...