Skip to main content

Versioning in graph databases

I got a question from one of my teams last week on how to apply versioning in Graph databases. There are multiple ways to tackle this problem but let me share the way I typically handle this.

What do you mean with ‘versioning’?

Let me start by explaining what I mean exactly with ‘versioning’.  Our data changes over time. Without versioning we only now the current state of our data but not what happened in the past. By applying versioning techniques, we can keep track of changes both on the data and its dependencies. This can be useful for auditing purposes but there are a lot more reasons why this can be applied.

There are multiple types of versioning but the question I got was related to time-based versioning. The idea with time-based versioning is that you can track changes over time. We end up with an append-only model where we are able to step through time to understand the state changes.

How to model time-based versioning in graph databases?

The core idea with time-based versioning in graph databases is to separate the entity from its state. We create a separate node for the entity itself and for its state. We track the time this state was applicable through the relationship between both entity and state node.

Separate object from state

Let me further explain this by giving a small example. We start with a simple Order node with a few properties.

What if we want to track the changes of the order over time? Let us separate the Order entity from the OrderState:

Now we can use the relationship to have time-based versioning. Nice!

Want to learn more?

If you want to learn more about this and other techniques, check out the following youtube video:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...