Skip to main content

Applying Postel’s law in ASP.NET Core–Part II

Yesterday I talked about Postel’s law or the Robustness principle and how it is import in building evolutionary systems. We had a look at how the built-in System.Text.Json serializer handles some scenario's. Today I want to focus on the ASP.NET Core model binding.

What is model binding?

Typically in ASP.NET Core you don’t access the raw HtpContext yourself to extract the JSON from the request body. Instead you let model binders do the hard work.

From the documentation:

Controllers and Razor pages work with data that comes from HTTP requests. For example, route data may provide a record key, and posted form fields may provide values for the properties of the model. Writing code to retrieve each of these values and convert them from strings to .NET types would be tedious and error-prone. Model binding automates this process. The model binding system:

  • Retrieves data from various sources such as route data, form fields, and query strings.
  • Provides the data to controllers and Razor pages in method parameters and public properties.
  • Converts string data to .NET types.
  • Updates properties of complex types.

Tolerant reader

Let’s find out if the Model Binder also behaves as a ‘tolerant reader’. I’ve created a small example controller that expects the same Person DTO as input:

We’ll start with the same use case as in our previous post. We include a Middlename property that doesn’t exist on our model:

This one succeeds. That is also a good start! Let us now check what happens if we forget to include a specific property:

Whoops! This time it fails because it has marked the Lastname field as required. This is because ASP.NET Core doesn’t only do Model Binding but also Model Validation. In this case because  ‘Nullable Reference Types’ are enabled and Lastname is not marked as nullable, we get a validation error.

I updated my model to mark this field as nullable and now the call succeeds:

Let’s try the last one as well and pass a value using an incorrect type. We are passing ‘age’ as a string:

This one succeeds. This is because ASP.NET Core supports type conversions for a range of simple types.

So it turns out that you would think that ASP.NET Core just directly uses the System.Text.Json serializer to parse the JSON request body, instead a lot more things are going on that impact the behaviour.

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...