Skip to main content

Applying Postel’s law in ASP.NET Core–Part II

Yesterday I talked about Postel’s law or the Robustness principle and how it is import in building evolutionary systems. We had a look at how the built-in System.Text.Json serializer handles some scenario's. Today I want to focus on the ASP.NET Core model binding.

What is model binding?

Typically in ASP.NET Core you don’t access the raw HtpContext yourself to extract the JSON from the request body. Instead you let model binders do the hard work.

From the documentation:

Controllers and Razor pages work with data that comes from HTTP requests. For example, route data may provide a record key, and posted form fields may provide values for the properties of the model. Writing code to retrieve each of these values and convert them from strings to .NET types would be tedious and error-prone. Model binding automates this process. The model binding system:

  • Retrieves data from various sources such as route data, form fields, and query strings.
  • Provides the data to controllers and Razor pages in method parameters and public properties.
  • Converts string data to .NET types.
  • Updates properties of complex types.

Tolerant reader

Let’s find out if the Model Binder also behaves as a ‘tolerant reader’. I’ve created a small example controller that expects the same Person DTO as input:

We’ll start with the same use case as in our previous post. We include a Middlename property that doesn’t exist on our model:

This one succeeds. That is also a good start! Let us now check what happens if we forget to include a specific property:

Whoops! This time it fails because it has marked the Lastname field as required. This is because ASP.NET Core doesn’t only do Model Binding but also Model Validation. In this case because  ‘Nullable Reference Types’ are enabled and Lastname is not marked as nullable, we get a validation error.

I updated my model to mark this field as nullable and now the call succeeds:

Let’s try the last one as well and pass a value using an incorrect type. We are passing ‘age’ as a string:

This one succeeds. This is because ASP.NET Core supports type conversions for a range of simple types.

So it turns out that you would think that ASP.NET Core just directly uses the System.Text.Json serializer to parse the JSON request body, instead a lot more things are going on that impact the behaviour.

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...