Skip to main content

Application Insights–OpenTelemetry integration for ASP.NET Core

OpenTelemetry is becoming THE standard of telemetry instrumentation. And thanks to the Azure Monitor OpenTelemetry Exporter we can keep using Application Insights as our tool of choice. In this post I'll walk you through the steps to link your OpenTelemetry enabled ASP.NET core application to Azure Monitor Application Insights.

Important to mention is that this feature is still in preview!

At the moment of writing distributed tracing and metrics are supported but some of the other features that we like from the Application Insights SDK are not available(yet).

What is not supported?

I copied the list from the documentation:

Add Azure Monitor OpenTelemetry Exporter to your ASP.NET Core application

Now that we now what isn’t available yet, let’s focus on what we can do and see how we can start instrumenting our ASP.NET Core application using OpenTelemetry.

Let’s start by adding the necessary Nuget packages:

dotnet add package --prerelease Azure.Monitor.OpenTelemetry.Exporter

We also add some extra packages to include extra instrumentation specific for ASP.NET Core:

dotnet add package --prerelease OpenTelemetry.Extensions.Hosting
dotnet add package --prerelease OpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.AspNetCore
dotnet add package --prerelease OpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.Http
dotnet add package --prerelease OpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.SqlClient

Now that we have all the packages we need, we can add the necessary instrumentation code:

We specified a servicename and version and added some extra attributes. But let’s take advantage of the extra instrumentation libraries we added and extend the configuration a little bit:

Last thing we need to add is the Azure Monitor OpenTelemetry exporter itself. Here we need to specify our Applications Insights connection string:

If we now run our application, our instrumentation data should be send to Application Insights.

More information: Enable Azure Monitor OpenTelemetry for .NET, Node.js, and Python applications - Azure Monitor | Microsoft Learn

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

The role of ActivitySource in OpenTelemetry for .NET

While doing some pair programming to integrate OpenTelemetry tracing to a .NET application, we had a discussion on how to use the ActivitySource . It looks simple. You new one up, give it a name, start an activity, done. The discussion started when we added a second ActivitySource with the exact same name in a different class. This made us wonder: "Are we duplicating traces now? Is this a memory leak? Do we need a singleton?" So we decided to dig deeper. This post is what we learned… What ActivitySource actually is ActivitySource is part of System.Diagnostics , not part of the OpenTelemetry NuGet packages. Microsoft built tracing primitives directly into the BCL, and OpenTelemetry's .NET SDK simply listens to them. This is why you can add distributed tracing to a library without taking a dependency on OpenTelemetry at all. An ActivitySource is a factory for Activity objects, and an Activity is .NET's name for what OpenTelemetry calls a span.(don’t ask m...