Skip to main content

Applying Postel’s law in ASP.NET Core–Part I

An important aspect in building robust systems is applying ‘Postel’s law’. Postel's Law was formulated by Jon Postel, an early pioneer of the Internet. The law was really a guideline for creators of software protocols. The idea was that different implementations of the protocol should interoperate. The law is today paraphrased as follows:

Be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others.

It is also called the Robustness principle and it is crucial in building evolvable systems. In this post I want to see how this law applies when building ASP.NET Core Web API’s. A typical use case in ASP.NET Core is the following:

  1. A client serializes the model in JSON and sends it over HTTP to our ASP.NET Core server.
  2. On the other side, the server gets the message, extracts the body of the requests and deserializes it back to a model.

It’s this second step specifically I want to focus on, how will ASP.NET Core (or more specifically the System.Text.Json serializer used out of the box) handle the JSON when it receives data it doesn’t expect. Let’s find out!

Remark: In a second post, I’ll have a look at how the ASP.NET Core Model binder handles these scenario’s.

We start a simple example model:

Let’s first see how the serializer handles an unknown property. We include a non existing Middlename property in our JSON input:

This test succeeds. That is a good start! Let us now check what happens if we forget to include a specific property:

This test succeeds as well. The Lastname property is set to the default value. OK, let’s try a third one, we provide a different type than expected. Age should be a number and we will provide a string:

This time our test fails with the following exception:

System.Text.Json.JsonException : The JSON value could not be converted to System.String. Path: $.Age | LineNumber: 0 | BytePositionInLine: 32.
---- System.InvalidOperationException : Cannot get the value of a token type 'Number' as a string.

We can see that the JsonSerializer already behaves like a ‘tolerant reader’. It is however possible to further improve this by changing the JsonSerializer behavior through the JsonSerializerOptions. For example we can ignore the propertyname casing by setting the PropertyNameCaseInsensitive value to true:

While writing this post I noticed the .NET 8 announcement where you can further control how missing properties should be handled:

It’s now possible to configure object deserialization behavior, whenever the underlying JSON payload includes properties that cannot be mapped to members of the deserialized POCO type. This can be controlled by setting a JsonUnmappedMemberHandling value, either as an annotation on the POCO type itself, globally on JsonSerializerOptions or programmatically by customizing the JsonTypeInfo contract for the relevant types:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...