Skip to main content

Applying Postel’s law in ASP.NET Core–Part I

An important aspect in building robust systems is applying ‘Postel’s law’. Postel's Law was formulated by Jon Postel, an early pioneer of the Internet. The law was really a guideline for creators of software protocols. The idea was that different implementations of the protocol should interoperate. The law is today paraphrased as follows:

Be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others.

It is also called the Robustness principle and it is crucial in building evolvable systems. In this post I want to see how this law applies when building ASP.NET Core Web API’s. A typical use case in ASP.NET Core is the following:

  1. A client serializes the model in JSON and sends it over HTTP to our ASP.NET Core server.
  2. On the other side, the server gets the message, extracts the body of the requests and deserializes it back to a model.

It’s this second step specifically I want to focus on, how will ASP.NET Core (or more specifically the System.Text.Json serializer used out of the box) handle the JSON when it receives data it doesn’t expect. Let’s find out!

Remark: In a second post, I’ll have a look at how the ASP.NET Core Model binder handles these scenario’s.

We start a simple example model:

Let’s first see how the serializer handles an unknown property. We include a non existing Middlename property in our JSON input:

This test succeeds. That is a good start! Let us now check what happens if we forget to include a specific property:

This test succeeds as well. The Lastname property is set to the default value. OK, let’s try a third one, we provide a different type than expected. Age should be a number and we will provide a string:

This time our test fails with the following exception:

System.Text.Json.JsonException : The JSON value could not be converted to System.String. Path: $.Age | LineNumber: 0 | BytePositionInLine: 32.
---- System.InvalidOperationException : Cannot get the value of a token type 'Number' as a string.

We can see that the JsonSerializer already behaves like a ‘tolerant reader’. It is however possible to further improve this by changing the JsonSerializer behavior through the JsonSerializerOptions. For example we can ignore the propertyname casing by setting the PropertyNameCaseInsensitive value to true:

While writing this post I noticed the .NET 8 announcement where you can further control how missing properties should be handled:

It’s now possible to configure object deserialization behavior, whenever the underlying JSON payload includes properties that cannot be mapped to members of the deserialized POCO type. This can be controlled by setting a JsonUnmappedMemberHandling value, either as an annotation on the POCO type itself, globally on JsonSerializerOptions or programmatically by customizing the JsonTypeInfo contract for the relevant types:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...