Skip to main content

Optimize your API performance with the System.Text.Json source generator

.NET 6 ships with a System.Text.Json source generator as a way to improve your API performance. By default the System.Text.Json serializer is using a lot of reflection behind the scenes. Of course this has a negative impact on startup performance, memory usage and is a problem for assembly trimming.

With the introduction of the System.Text.Json source generator you get a compile-time alternative that can give your API performance a boost. It introduces the following benefits:

  • Increased serialization throughput
  • Reduced start-up time
  • Reduced private memory usage
  • Removed runtime use of System.Reflection and System.Reflection.Emit
  • Trim-compatible serialization which reduces application size

Let me walk you through the steps to configure this for your application.

Configure the System.Text.Json source generator

Source generators are a little bit magical. So we have to take some steps to get it working.

Remark: The source generator is part of the 6.0 release of the System.Text.Json NuGet package.

First we need to create an (internal) partial class which derives from JsonSerializerContext.:

For every type we want to serialize through the source generator, we need to add a JsonSerializableAttribute on top of this class:

We can further control the serialization process through the JsonSerializerOptionsAttribute:

Let’s have a look what is generated by the source generator. You can use a decompiler for that or the MSBuild trick mentioned here.

Here are our data contracts:

And here is a part of the generated code:

Whow! That is a lot of code...

Use the generated code with the JsonSerializer

The JsonSerializer introduces some new overloads that allow you to use the generated code:

Or:

Integrate it in your ASP.NET Core application

Of course in your ASP.NET Core application you typically don’t invoke the JsonSerializer directly and typically just return a model:

In that case how can we use this source generator? We need to call the AddJsonOptions() on the IServiceCollection and specify our JsonContext class on the JsonSerializerOptions:

So that should be enough to get started with the System.Text.Json source generator.

If you want to learn more, have a look here: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/try-the-new-system-text-json-source-generator/

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...