Skip to main content

.NET Core Dependency Injection–Using multiple implementations of the same interface

On most of my projects I'm using Autofac as the Inversion of Control container of my choice. However this introduces an extra dependency and it comes with a (although short) learning curve. So o a newer project, I decided to give the built-in IoC container in .NET Core another try.

The standard DI stuff worked as expected, however there was one situation where I had to investigate a little further. Let me explain...

Registering multiple implementations for the same interface

Here is my use case; in my application I’m using Serilog. One of the features that Serilog has to offer is the concept of an enricher. This allows you to enrich your log messages  with extra information in an easy way. As some of my enrichers required dependencies I wanted to register those enrichers in my  IoC container.

When using Autofac I would have done this like this:

To do the same thing using the Microsoft DI container is not that different:

The AddTransient() method will not override an existing registration allowing us to register multiple implementations for the same interface.

Remark: If you want to have only one implementation registered for a specific interface, you can use the TryAdd… methods available as part of the Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Extensions namespace.

Resolving multiple implementations for the same interface

Ok, that was not that hard. How can we now resolve these implementations?

What is not possible is to resolve a specific implementation as there is no support for keyed or named services. (Have a look here if you want to see how can be done suing Autofac).

Luckily in this case I wanted to get ALL implementations back. That can be done by resolving an IEnumerable<IRegisteredInterface> instance. This will load all registered implementations from the DI container.

Nice!

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...