Skip to main content

Add approvals to your Azure Pipelines yaml

I'm working on converting an Azure DevOps Release pipeline to a yaml pipeline. In my original Release pipeline I had multiple environments with approvals between every environment. In the 'classic' Release pipeline, this can easily done through the 'Pre-deployment conditions'. Let's find out how we can achieve the same thing through a YAML pipeline.

The manual validation task

Although the second solution I’ll show you is the better way in my opinion, I still want to first mention is the manual validation task. This task allows you to pause the pipeline run and wait for manual approval.

The waitForValidation job pauses the run and triggers a prompt within the Pipeline UI to review and validate the task. The email addresses listed in notifyUsers receive a notification to approve or deny the pipeline run.

More information: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/pipelines/release/deploy-using-approvals?view=azure-devops#set-up-manual-validation

Add approvals using Environments

A second (and better way) to introduce approvals is through Environments. To see the available environments, go to your Azure DevOps project and select Environments from the Pipelines section:

You should see a list of existing environments(if any):

Create an environment

You can create environments yourself or if you are using the deployment job in your pipeline, the environment is created for you when you run the pipeline for the first time.

If you don’t have an environment yet, create one by clicking on New environment.

Specify an environment name, select ‘None’ as resource and click on Create.

Configure an approval for an environment

Now that we have our environments, it is time to configure our approvals.

Click on a specific environment in the Environments list.

Click on the three dots on the right side and select Approvals and checks.

On the Approvals and checks page, you can add approvals, branch control, business hours (and more).

Click on the + on the right side, select Approvals and click on Next.

Now we can configure the Approval. I set myself as an approver and allow me to approve my own runs. I leave the timeout at 30 days. Click on Create to complete the configuration process.

A new check is added to the list:

Run the pipeline

If we now run our pipeline, you see that the deployment stops and waits for our approval:

We can now click on Review and Approve to continue the release:

 

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

The role of ActivitySource in OpenTelemetry for .NET

While doing some pair programming to integrate OpenTelemetry tracing to a .NET application, we had a discussion on how to use the ActivitySource . It looks simple. You new one up, give it a name, start an activity, done. The discussion started when we added a second ActivitySource with the exact same name in a different class. This made us wonder: "Are we duplicating traces now? Is this a memory leak? Do we need a singleton?" So we decided to dig deeper. This post is what we learned… What ActivitySource actually is ActivitySource is part of System.Diagnostics , not part of the OpenTelemetry NuGet packages. Microsoft built tracing primitives directly into the BCL, and OpenTelemetry's .NET SDK simply listens to them. This is why you can add distributed tracing to a library without taking a dependency on OpenTelemetry at all. An ActivitySource is a factory for Activity objects, and an Activity is .NET's name for what OpenTelemetry calls a span.(don’t ask m...