Skip to main content

Using Github Copilot in Visual Studio

With GitHub Copilot you get autocomplete-style suggestions from an AI pair programmer as you code. Let me show you how to get started with Github Copilot in Visual Studio.

Remark: Before you can start you need to have an active GitHub Copilot subscription.

Install the extension

You can install the extension directly in Visual Studio.

  • Therefore go to Extensions –> Manage Extensions in Visual Studio.
  • Search for Github Copilot and click on Download.

  • After restarting Visual Studio, Visual Studio will ask you to active Github Copilot on your device. After walking through the device activation flow, you are finally ready to go.

Writing code with Github Copilot

Now that our extensions is up and running, let us write some code. When using Github Copilot it feels like you have a lot smarter Intellisense available.

I create a Book class and when I try to add a property Visual Studio is aware that I want to add typical properties for a book, so I get suggestions like title, author, etc…

I can hit Tab to accept the suggestion or Alt+; to get another suggestion:

If I want to see a whole list of possible suggestions, I can click on the Github Copilot icon at the bottom of my editor and click on Open Copilot. Now a separate Copilot window is loaded were I get a range of of possible solutions:

I can use one of the provided solutions by clicking on Accept solution.

Of course we can do more. A second thing we can do is writing a meaningful method signature and Github Copilot will try to understand what it should do and provide us with a suggestion.

For example I wrote an IsValidISBN() method to validate if the provided ISBN number is indeed a valid one. I could look up what are the validation rules for an ISBN number but Github Copilot already provides me a possible implementation:

A similar thing is possible through code comments. Use natural language to write a comment about what you expect. This can be one or more lines.

For example I asked Github copilot to write me an XUnit test for my IsValidISBN() method:

This is certainly a useful help to become a more productive developer.

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...