Skip to main content

Package Validation

I recently discovered a .NET feature I didn’t know it existed; Package validation. Package validation was introduced as a part of the .NET 6 SDK. It allows you as a package author to check if your NuGet packages are consistent and well formed. At the moment of writing this post, the tooling provides the following checks:

  • Validates that there are no breaking changes across versions.
  • Validates that the package has the same set of publics APIs for all the different runtime-specific implementations.
  • Helps developers catch any applicability holes.

Enabling package validation is nothing more than setting the EnablePackageValidation property to true in your csproj file:

Now 3 different validators can kick in everytime you run dotnet pack:

  • The Baseline version validator validates your library project against a previously released, stable version of your package.
  • The Compatible runtime validator validates that your runtime-specific implementation assemblies are compatible with each other and with the compile-time assemblies.
  • The Compatible framework validator validates that code compiled against one framework can run against all the others in a multi-targeting package.

I’m interested in the Baseline version validator so let us focus on that one in this post.

The baseline validator allows you to validate your library project against a previously released, stable version of your package. It will detect any breaking change.

Before you can use the baseline validator, you first need to specify the baseline package that should be used as a comparison.

NuGet hosted packages

If your package is hosted on NuGet you can use the PackageValidationBaselineVersion property.Set it to a previous version you want to compare to. For example:

If I now run dotnet pack, I get an error message:

In this example it is because in the deployed package I have set both the AssemblyVersion and PackageVersion and in the local version I have only  set the PackageVersion.

But you also get errors when you do a breaking change. For example, I added an extra parameter to a public function. This results in the following error message:

Other package sources

If your package is not hosted on NuGet, you can still use the Baseline version validator but you should use the PackageValidationBaselinePath property and point it to the file location of your baseline NuGet package:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...