Skip to main content

Learning from failure in software

Although not everyone in my team would agree, I dare to say that building software is easy. The difficult part starts AFTER your first release when you need to start maintaining the application you've build while at the same time introducing new features, keeping the technical debt under control, evolve the application architecture under ever changing business needs and all of this at a minimal cost.

Building software is easy

During the lifetime of our application failures will happen. Although this is difficult to explain to our business stakeholders, failure in software is inevitable; people make mistakes, requirements are misunderstood, business needs change, … Rather than engaging in a man hunt to avoid failure, we embrace it and focus on learning from our mistakes.

Embrace failure

An important tool in our toolbox here is incident analysis; we need to figure out what happened, what caused a failure and most important how we can improve. In the complex (distributed) systems we build today, failure is seldom a simple sequence of cause and effect. The good news is that small failures are caused by the same systemic issues as large failures. So start treating every failure as an opportunity to learn and improve.

In that regard I would like to introduce you to https://www.learningfromincidents.io/.

The idea of this website is to create a community that reshapes how the software industry thinks about incidents, software reliability, and the critical role people play in keeping their systems running. If this community is successful, people will be doing and thinking about incident analysis in completely different ways than they were doing it before — as a valuable lens into not only where incidents come from, but what normally prevents them, what people do (and don’t) learn from them, and what makes incidents matter long after the dust has settled.

Learn more about this in their introduction post.

Remark: If you want to learn more about learning from your mistakes, the Google SRE book is a must read.

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Kubernetes–Limit your environmental impact

Reducing the carbon footprint and CO2 emission of our (cloud) workloads, is a responsibility of all of us. If you are running a Kubernetes cluster, have a look at Kube-Green . kube-green is a simple Kubernetes operator that automatically shuts down (some of) your pods when you don't need them. A single pod produces about 11 Kg CO2eq per year( here the calculation). Reason enough to give it a try! Installing kube-green in your cluster The easiest way to install the operator in your cluster is through kubectl. We first need to install a cert-manager: kubectl apply -f https://github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager/releases/download/v1.14.5/cert-manager.yaml Remark: Wait a minute before you continue as it can take some time before the cert-manager is up & running inside your cluster. Now we can install the kube-green operator: kubectl apply -f https://github.com/kube-green/kube-green/releases/latest/download/kube-green.yaml Now in the namespace where we want t...

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...