Skip to main content

Share reusable UI components through a Razor class library

One ASP.NET Core feature that I really like and most people are not aware of it existence are Razor Class libraries(RCL). With RCL you can package Razor views, pages, Razor components and view components and reuse them in different applications.

I blogged about RCL before and although I really like the feature I got feedback from my development teams that the behavior was not consistent and they sometimes couldn’t get it working. I never had time to really investigate the root cause until now.

So this blog post is here to explain my findings.

The development environment

First of all it is important to understand that the behavior of RCL is different in Development compared to other environments. When running the app that uses the RCL from build output (dotnet run), static web assets are enabled that allow ASP.NET Core to load static web assets from locations outside the wwwroot. This is required because ASP.NET Core will load the assets directly from the RCL NuGet location. 

By default this is only enabled in the Development environment. To support assets in other environments when running from build output, call UseStaticWebAssets on the host builder in Program.cs:

So that explains some of the issues that people encountered. This only works in Development so if you created and used a different environment during development the assets are not loaded.

dotnet publish

The second important thing to remember is that the behavior is completely different when you publish your application. When you run dotnet publish, the static content from the RCL is copied over to the wwwroot folder:

Because the files are served as static content, the Static files middleware should be enabled as well:

Hope that helps!

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...