Skip to main content

Share reusable UI components through a Razor class library

One ASP.NET Core feature that I really like and most people are not aware of it existence are Razor Class libraries(RCL). With RCL you can package Razor views, pages, Razor components and view components and reuse them in different applications.

I blogged about RCL before and although I really like the feature I got feedback from my development teams that the behavior was not consistent and they sometimes couldn’t get it working. I never had time to really investigate the root cause until now.

So this blog post is here to explain my findings.

The development environment

First of all it is important to understand that the behavior of RCL is different in Development compared to other environments. When running the app that uses the RCL from build output (dotnet run), static web assets are enabled that allow ASP.NET Core to load static web assets from locations outside the wwwroot. This is required because ASP.NET Core will load the assets directly from the RCL NuGet location. 

By default this is only enabled in the Development environment. To support assets in other environments when running from build output, call UseStaticWebAssets on the host builder in Program.cs:

So that explains some of the issues that people encountered. This only works in Development so if you created and used a different environment during development the assets are not loaded.

dotnet publish

The second important thing to remember is that the behavior is completely different when you publish your application. When you run dotnet publish, the static content from the RCL is copied over to the wwwroot folder:

Because the files are served as static content, the Static files middleware should be enabled as well:

Hope that helps!

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...