Skip to main content

Impress your colleagues with your knowledge about..the PrintMembers method

Sometimes when working with C# you discover some hidden gems. Some of them very useful, other ones a little bit harder to find a good way to benefit from their functionality. One of those hidden gems that I discovered some days ago is the PrintMembers method.

Record Types

To explain where you can find this method, I first have to talk about record types.  Record types were introduced in C# 9 as a new reference type that you can create instead of classes or structs. C# 10 adds record structs so that you can define records as value types.

Records are distinct from classes in that record types use value-based equality. Two variables of a record type are equal if the record type definitions are identical, and if for every field, the values in both records are equal.

Record types have a compiler-generated ToString method that displays the names and values of public properties and fields:

Person{ FirstName = Bart, LastName = Wullems }

In an application we are building we are using this ToString() method to generate a cache key. This works great until you add another reference type to your record type:

If we now print out the value, we see the following:

Product { FirstName = Bart, LastName = Wullems, PhoneNumbers = System.String[] }

We no longer have uniqueness what doesn’t make it a good cache key anymore.

PrintMembers

Let’s fix this by implementing a PrintMembers method on our record type.

Important! If you want to do this,  you need to be aware about the following:

  • For a sealed record that derives from object (doesn't declare a base record): private bool PrintMembers(StringBuilder builder);
  • For a sealed record that derives from another record (note that the enclosing type is sealed, so the method is effectively sealed): protected override bool PrintMembers(StringBuilder builder);
  • For a record that isn't sealed and derives from object: protected virtual bool PrintMembers(StringBuilder builder);
  • For a record that isn't sealed and derives from another record: protected override bool PrintMembers(StringBuilder builder);

Here is the implementation for our Person class:

If we now print out the value,  all the values are included:

Product { FirstName = Bart, LastName = Wullems, PhoneNumbers = 123/45.67.89,987/65.43.21 }

Nice!

More information:

Records - C# reference | Microsoft Learn

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...