Skip to main content

Azure Pipelines - Generate your software bill of materials (SBOM) **Updated**

A few months ago, I introduced the concept of an SBOM(Software Bill of Materials) and how you could integrate this in your Azure DevOps Pipelines.

A quick fix

Last week I noticed that the builds where I was using this approach started to fail. Here is the error I got:

"C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\powershell.exe" -NoLogo -NoProfile -NonInteractive -ExecutionPolicy Unrestricted -Command ". 'D:\b\2\_work\_temp\f7a4bfef-55b7-46ca-bc35-5fa4674dc781.ps1'"

Encountered error while running ManifestTool generation workflow. Error: The value of PackageSupplier can't be null or empty.

##[error]PowerShell exited with code '1'.

Finishing: Generate sbom

Turns out that an updated version of the Microsoft sbom-tool was released. In this version a new required parameter was introduced;

-ps <package supplier>

So I opened the failing pipelines and added this extra argument:

# Write your PowerShell commands here.
Invoke-WebRequest -Uri "
https://github.com/microsoft/sbom-tool/releases/latest/download/sbom-tool-win-x64.exe" -OutFile "$(Agent.TempDirectory)/sbom-tool.exe"
$(Agent.TempDirectory)/sbom-tool generate -b $(Build.ArtifactStagingDirectory) -bc $(Build.SourcesDirectory) -pn Example -pv 1.0.0 -nsb
https://sbom.mycompany.com –ps PackageSupplierName -V Verbose

The SBOM .NET Tool

This would have been a really short post if this was the only thing I wanted to talk about.  While investigating the issue above I noticed the following in the documentation:

There is now a dotnet global tool for generating the SBOM.

Time to throw out the exe and use the SBOM .NET tool instead!

I removed the original Powershell task and introduced 2 new tasks:

The first task will download and install the SBOM global tool:

The second task will invoke the installed SBOM tool:

This will produce exactly the same results as the original Powershell task:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...