Skip to main content

Azure Pipelines - Generate your software bill of materials (SBOM) **Updated**

A few months ago, I introduced the concept of an SBOM(Software Bill of Materials) and how you could integrate this in your Azure DevOps Pipelines.

A quick fix

Last week I noticed that the builds where I was using this approach started to fail. Here is the error I got:

"C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\powershell.exe" -NoLogo -NoProfile -NonInteractive -ExecutionPolicy Unrestricted -Command ". 'D:\b\2\_work\_temp\f7a4bfef-55b7-46ca-bc35-5fa4674dc781.ps1'"

Encountered error while running ManifestTool generation workflow. Error: The value of PackageSupplier can't be null or empty.

##[error]PowerShell exited with code '1'.

Finishing: Generate sbom

Turns out that an updated version of the Microsoft sbom-tool was released. In this version a new required parameter was introduced;

-ps <package supplier>

So I opened the failing pipelines and added this extra argument:

# Write your PowerShell commands here.
Invoke-WebRequest -Uri "
https://github.com/microsoft/sbom-tool/releases/latest/download/sbom-tool-win-x64.exe" -OutFile "$(Agent.TempDirectory)/sbom-tool.exe"
$(Agent.TempDirectory)/sbom-tool generate -b $(Build.ArtifactStagingDirectory) -bc $(Build.SourcesDirectory) -pn Example -pv 1.0.0 -nsb
https://sbom.mycompany.com –ps PackageSupplierName -V Verbose

The SBOM .NET Tool

This would have been a really short post if this was the only thing I wanted to talk about.  While investigating the issue above I noticed the following in the documentation:

There is now a dotnet global tool for generating the SBOM.

Time to throw out the exe and use the SBOM .NET tool instead!

I removed the original Powershell task and introduced 2 new tasks:

The first task will download and install the SBOM global tool:

The second task will invoke the installed SBOM tool:

This will produce exactly the same results as the original Powershell task:

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...