Skip to main content

C# 11 – File Scoped Types

One of the new features in C# 11 is File Scoped Types also known as File Local Types. Although it sounds kindof familiar to File Scoped Namespaces introduced in C# 10, it is completely unrelated.

As the name implies File Scoped types restrict the usage of a type to the current file.

The file modifier

To use this feature a new modifier was introduced; file. Applying this modifier to any type definition restrict its usage to the current file.

In the screenshot above you can see that I created a File class in both the FileReader.cs file and FileWriter.cs file without any issues.

If I try to use this File class outside these 2 files, I get an error:

Good to know:

  • The file modifier can be applied to class, interface, record, struct, enum, delegate.
  • It cannot be combined with another modifier like internal or public.

When should I use this feature?

There are a few use cases I can think about where I see this feature useful:

  • Code generation: Code generation is one of the places where naming collisions can easily occur. We typically solve this by using different namespaces With the file keyword it can make code generation a lot easier.
  • Nested classes: One way I use to avoid naming collisions is through private nested classes. Here the file keyword can be a cleaner alternative.

 

What is happening behind the scenes?

To have  a look at what is happening behind the scenes, I opened the compiled code in dotPeek:

As you can see above, the C# compiler renames the types to avoid naming collisions.

Nice!

    Popular posts from this blog

    Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

    After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

    Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

    While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

    The role of ActivitySource in OpenTelemetry for .NET

    While doing some pair programming to integrate OpenTelemetry tracing to a .NET application, we had a discussion on how to use the ActivitySource . It looks simple. You new one up, give it a name, start an activity, done. The discussion started when we added a second ActivitySource with the exact same name in a different class. This made us wonder: "Are we duplicating traces now? Is this a memory leak? Do we need a singleton?" So we decided to dig deeper. This post is what we learned… What ActivitySource actually is ActivitySource is part of System.Diagnostics , not part of the OpenTelemetry NuGet packages. Microsoft built tracing primitives directly into the BCL, and OpenTelemetry's .NET SDK simply listens to them. This is why you can add distributed tracing to a library without taking a dependency on OpenTelemetry at all. An ActivitySource is a factory for Activity objects, and an Activity is .NET's name for what OpenTelemetry calls a span.(don’t ask m...