Skip to main content

VS Code–Share your settings using profiles

After working a long time on the same laptop, it was time again to switch to a new machine. This can be a cumbersome experience as you need to copy over all the data, install all your favorite apps and reconfigure everything.

Luckily I already created a WinGet script a long time ago that simplifies the installation process and have most information stored on my OneDrive. However I still need to reconfigure my VS Code instance. I tweaked a lot of settings, have a long list of extensions installed and adjusted the UI layout.

The good news is that I don’t have to do all this work myself as VS Code supports the concept of profiles. VS Code Profiles let you create sets of customizations and quickly switch between them or share them with others.

After installing VS Code, a Default Profile is created. As you modify settings, install extensions, or change UI layout by moving views, these customizations are tracked in the Default Profile.

To create a new profile, you can use the File > Preferences > Profiles (Default) > Create Profile menu item;

You can specify a profile name and choose which settings are configured in the profile:

You can create a profile from one of the profile templates or from an existing template:

As I wanted to reuse my profile on my new laptop, I first need to export the template using File > Preferences > Profiles (Default) > Export Profile:

The Export Profile command displays the Profiles view with the contents of the active profile and an Export button. I can still unselect various elements of the profile if I want to:

When clicking on the Export button I can choose to export to either a local file or a (secret) Github gist.

After choosing to save to GitHub (and authenticate on Github), a dialog gives the option to Copy Link to share our profile gist URL with others:

 

More information

Profiles in Visual Studio Code

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...