Skip to main content

Angular Cache

Last week I got a call from our operations team indicating that one of our build server disks was filling up. While investigating what could be the root cause, I noticed the .angular folder for each of our Angular frontend applications.

I had no idea what this folder does, so let us find out together in this blog post…

TLDR; The .angular folder is used by the Angular CLI to cache the previous builds to reduce the build operations and improves the build time.

The .angular folder appeared in version 13 and is used as a disk cache by the Angular CLI to save a number of cachable operations on disk by default. When you re-run the same build, the build system restores the state of the previous build and re-uses previously performed operations, which decreases the time taken to build and test your applications and libraries.

If we look what is inside, we see 2 things:

  • An angular-webpack folder containing the binary files.
  • A babel-webpack folder containing all the text files in .json format.

According to the documentation the disk cache is only enabled for local environments. However you can change this value by  adding the cli.cache object to your Workspace Configuration. The object goes under cli.cache at the top level of the file, outside the projects sections.

The value of environment can be one of the following:

  • all - allows disk cache on all machines.
  • local - allows disk cache only on development machines.
  • ci - allows disk cache only on continuous integration (CI) systems.

So far, so good. The strange this is that although it should only be enabled for local environments, the disk cache seems to be active on our build server as well.

The question is; how does Angular now the difference between our local and CI environment?

I found the answer while browsing through the Angular CLI source code. It checks if an environment variable named CI with a value of ‘true’ is present.

So I logged in on our build server and introduced this environment variable.

More information

Angular - ng cache

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...