Skip to main content

.NET 8–Using reflection in a AOT enabled application

With the upcoming .NET 8 release, Microsoft is spending a lot of effort in further improving AOT(Ahead-of-Time) compilation. Using Native AOT compared to the JIT(Just-in-Time) compiler offers the following benefits:

  • Minimized disk footprint: When publishing using native AOT, a single executable is produced containing just the code from external dependencies that is needed to support the program. Reduced executable size can lead to:    
    • Smaller container images, for example in containerized deployment scenarios.
    • Reduced deployment time from smaller images
  • Reduced startup time: Native AOT applications can show reduced start-up times, which means    
    • The app is ready to service requests quicker.
    • Improved deployment where container orchestrators need to manage transition from one version of the app to another.
  • Reduced memory demand: Native AOT apps can have reduced memory demands, depending on the work done by the app. Reduced memory consumption can lead to greater deployment density and improved scalability.

Although the list above should make it obvious that using AOT has a lot of benefits, it also comes with some limitations.

One of these limitations is the lack of support for reflection. For example, setting a private field using reflection is no longer possible. So the following code will not work using native AOT:

The code above is using reflection which is slow. .NET 8 provides a new zero-overhead way to access private members. This is done using the [UnsafeAccessorAttribute] attribute.

Let us rewrite our example using this attribute:

This not only works for private fields but can also be used for:

  • Constructors: [UnsafeAccessor(UnsafeAccessorKind.Constructor)]
  • Methods: [UnsafeAccessor(UnsafeAccessorKind.Method, Name = "MethodName")]
  • Properties: [UnsafeAccessor(UnsafeAccessorKind.Method, Name = "set_PropertyName")]

More information

ASP.NET Core support for native AOT | Microsoft Learnt

Native AOT deployment overview - .NET | Microsoft Learn

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...