Skip to main content

ASP.NET Core–Factory based vs Convention based middleware

Today I had to create my own ASP.NET Core middleware. I forgot how to exactly do this but I noticed that an IMiddleware interface existed. I wasn't aware of this interface which brought me to the discovery that there in fact multiple ways to define and create middleware in ASP.NET Core.

Let’s explain each one of them and discuss the differences.

Inline middleware

The simplest solution is to use an inline request delegate:

This is a great way for simple use cases but once your middleware gets more complex it is time to move to one of the 2 other approaches.

Convention based middleware

The convention based middleware is the one I was aware of that it existed and that I had used before. To use the convention based middleware you create a separate class that follows these rules:

  • It has a public constructor with a parameter of type RequestDelegate.
  • It contains a public method named Invoke or InvokeAsync. This method must:
    • Return a Task.
    • Accept a first parameter of type HttpContext.

Remark: If you want to inject extra dependencies, you can use constructor injection for the dependencies with a singleton lifetime and add extra parameters to the InvokeAsync() method for your transient and scoped dependencies:

To add this middleware to the request pipeline, you need to use the UseMiddleware() method:

Factory based middleware

The last option is the factory based middleware. To use this approach you need to implement the IMiddleware interface I was mentioning in the introduction.

The advantage is that there is no longer conventional magic and that dependencies are injected through the constructor. As the factory based middleware is activated per client request (connection), scoped services can be injected into the middleware's constructor without issues.

Adding this middleware can be done in the same way as with the previous approach:

The only thing you may not forget is that you have to register the middleware class in your IoC container:

More information:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...