Skip to main content

Using secrets in your unit tests

I'm having fun creating a small open-source project(more about that later). In a part of this project I need to integrate with an existing API. Of course I want to have the necessary integration tests that help me verify if the integration with this API works correctly. There is only one problem, I need to pass an API key to call this API. How can I safely use and store this API key in my tests without checking the key in as part of my source code?

ASP.NET Core Secret Manager

In your ASP.NET Core application self you can use the Secret Manager Tool. This tool allows you to store your secrets in a separate location from the project tree. This guarantees that the app secrets aren’t checked into source control.

The Secret Manager tool hides implementation details, such as where and how the values are stored. The values are stored in a JSON file in the local machine's user profile folder. For example on Windows:

%APPDATA%\Microsoft\UserSecrets\<user_secrets_id>\secrets.json

In the file path above, the <user_secrets_id> should be replaced with the UserSecretsId value specified in the project file.

More about the Secret Manager here.

The question is:

Can we use the ASP.NET Core Secret Manager also in our unit test projects?

Let’s find out!

Using the Secret Manager in our Unit Test projects

In your unit test project, add the following NuGet Package:

dotnet add package Microsoft.Exensions.Configuration.UserSecrets

After adding the NuGet Package, open the csproj file and add a UserSecretsId property:

Remark: The value for UserSecretsId can be anything as long as it is unique(that is the reason why I added a GUID in the example above).

Now I tried to add the Secret Manager Tool itself:

dotnet add package Microsoft.Extensions.SecretManager.Tools

Unfortunately this doesn’t seem to work and resulted in the following output error:

Package ‘Microsoft.Extensions.SecretManager.Tools 2.0.2’ has a package type ‘DotnetCliTool’ that is not supported by project ‘TestProject’

It turns out that this isn’t such a big problem because you can still right click on the Unit test project in Visual Studio and choose ‘Manage User Secrets’.

This will also load the secrets.json and allow you to add any values:

Using the Secrets in your Unit Test

Now we can setup our tests to use this secret. First we need to build the IConfigurationRoot object:

Through this IConfigurationRoot object we can now load a specific secret value from the secrets.json:

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...