Skip to main content

RabbitMQ Streams–Reliable producers

Last week I introduced RabbitMQ streams and how you could produce and consume streams through the RabbitMQ.Stream.Client in .NET.

The default Producer is really low-level and leaves a lot of things to be implemented by us. For example, we have to increment the PublishingId ourselves with every Send() operation. Let’s find out how we can improve this through Reliable Producers.

Introducing Reliable Producers

Reliable Producer builts on top of the Producer and adds the following features:

  • Provide publishingID automatically
  • Auto-Reconnect in case of disconnection
  • Trace sent and received messages
  • Invalidate messages
  • Handle the metadata Update

Provide publishingID automatically

When using a Reliable Producer it retrieves the last publishingID given the producer name.  This means that it becomes important to choose a good reference value.

Auto-Reconnect

The Reliable Producer  will try to restore the TCP connection when the Producer is disconnected for some reason.

Trace sent and received messages

The Reliable Producer keeps each sent message in memory and removes it from memory when the message is confirmed or goes in timeout.

Invalidate messages

If the client doesn't receive a confirmation within 2 seconds the Reliable Producer removes the message from the internal messages cache. The user will receive ConfirmationStatus.TimeoutError in the ConfirmationHandler.

Handle the metadata update

If the streams  topology changes (ex:Stream deleted or add/remove follower), the client receives an MetadataUpdate event. The Reliable Producer detects this event and tries to reconnect the producer if the stream still exist or closes the producer/consumer when the stream is deleted.

Sending messages through Reliable Producers

The Reliable Producer also provides a Send() method but only requires the message as parameter because the publishingId is provided automatically:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...