Skip to main content

Catching dependency injection configuration errors early

When building applications with .NET's dependency injection container, misconfigured services can lead to runtime exceptions that only surface when a particular code path is executed.

Consider this scenario: you've registered a service with dependencies, but accidentally forgot to register one of those dependencies. Without validation, your application starts successfully, but crashes later when someone tries to use that service:

This only fails when OrderService is first resolved, which might be deep in your application logic or in a rarely-used code path.

Failing fast

A better option is to fail fast and be aware of this problem immediately. This is exactly what the ValidateOnBuild property does. It tells the DI container to validate all registered services during the application startup phase:

Now, instead of a runtime failure later, you get an immediate exception during startup with a clear error message about the missing dependency.

Remark: Be aware, this is not an error during compilation but during application startup.

There's a small startup cost since the container needs to validate all registrations. For most applications, this is negligible, but if you have thousands of services or complex validation logic, you might notice a slight delay in application startup.

ValidateScopes

Related to ValidateOnBuild is the ValidateScopes property, which ensures scoped services aren't resolved from the root container:

Together, these options provide robust validation of your DI configuration.

More information

ASP.NET Core Scope Validation

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...