Skip to main content

Understanding AsNoTrackingWithIdentityResolution in Entity Framework Core

When working with Entity Framework Core, understanding change tracking behavior is crucial for both performance and data consistency. While I was ware of the AsNoTracking() method, I discovered a lesser-known but powerful alternative: AsNoTrackingWithIdentityResolution() during a code review. 

Let's explore what makes this method special and when you should use it.

Quick recap: What is AsNoTracking()?

Before diving into AsNoTrackingWithIdentityResolution, let's briefly review AsNoTracking(). By default, EF Core tracks all entities returned from queries in the change tracker. This tracking enables:

  • Automatic detection of changes to entities
  • Update operations without explicitly attaching entities
  • Identity resolution (ensuring only one instance per entity exists in memory)

However, tracking comes with overhead. When you're performing read-only operations where you don't need to update data, AsNoTracking() improves performance by skipping the change tracker entirely.

The problem AsNoTracking() creates

While AsNoTracking() improves performance, it introduces a subtle but important issue: duplicate entity instances. Without the change tracker performing identity resolution, you can end up with multiple instances of the same entity in memory.

Consider this scenario:

If multiple orders belong to the same customer, you'll get separate Customer instances for each order, even though they represent the same database record. This means:

  • Increased memory usage
  • Potential confusion when comparing entities
  • Loss of referential integrity in your object graph

Enter AsNoTrackingWithIdentityResolution()

AsNoTrackingWithIdentityResolution() solves this problem by providing the best of both worlds:

  • No change tracking (performance benefit)
  • Identity resolution (ensuring single instances of entities)

When you use AsNoTrackingWithIdentityResolution(), EF Core:

  1. Executes the query without attaching entities to the change tracker
  2. Maintains a temporary identity map during query materialization
  3. Ensures that entities with the same key reference the same instance
  4. Discards the identity map after the query completes

This means you get identity resolution during the query execution without the ongoing overhead of change tracking.

If you find yourself using AsNoTrackingWithIdentityResolution() frequently, you can set it as the default tracking behavior:

When to use each method

Use Default Tracking when:

  • You need to update, delete, or track changes to entities
  • Working with small result sets where tracking overhead is negligible
  • You need automatic change detection

Use AsNoTracking when:

  • Performing read-only operations
  • You don't have navigation properties or related entities
  • Maximum performance is critical
  • Result sets don't contain duplicate entities

Use AsNoTrackingWithIdentityResolution when:

  • Performing read-only operations with includes/joins
  • You need referential integrity in your object graph
  • Working with queries that return the same entity multiple times
  • You want to compare entities by reference

More information

EntityFrameworkQueryableExtensions.AsNoTrackingWithIdentityResolution<TEntity> Method (Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore) | Microsoft Learn

DbContextOptionsBuilder.UseQueryTrackingBehavior Method (Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore) | Microsoft Learn

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...