Skip to main content

Securing Your ASP.NET Core App with Authorization Fallback Policy

Today, when building web applications, security has to be a top priority. An easy mistake to make is forgetting to add the [Authorize] attribute to controllers or actions inside your ASP.NET Core backend. This creates a security vulnerability where sensitive pages become accessible to unauthenticated users.

Of course, you could create a SecureBaseController class that includes this attribute but now you need to remember to inherit from this base class.

Instead of remembering to secure every single endpoint, what if we could flip the script and make authentication the default?

Setting an Authorization Fallback Policy

ASP.NET Core provides a powerful feature called the Authorization Fallback Policy. This allows you to require authentication globally across your entire application, making security the default rather than an opt-in feature.

To implement it, in your Program.cs file, configure the authorization services with a fallback policy that requires authenticated users:

This simple configuration ensures that all endpoints require authentication by default.

Now that authentication is required everywhere, you need to explicitly mark which endpoints should be publicly accessible:

Important to notice is that this is only a first line of defense, preventing an unauthenticated user to access your website. The next layer is to implement authorization.

Remember: in security, it's better to fail closed (deny by default) than to fail open (allow by default). The fallback policy helps you achieve exactly that.

More information

Overview of ASP.NET Core Authentication | Microsoft Learn

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...