Skip to main content

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message:

Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125


Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue:

We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong:

>podman info

OS: windows/amd64

provider: wsl

version: 5.3.1

Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM

Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it.

That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM:

>podman machine list

NAME                    VM TYPE     CREATED       LAST UP     CPUS        MEMORY      DISK SIZE

podman-machine-default  wsl         6 months ago  4 days ago  2           2GiB        100GiB

The machine is still there so that is good news. Let’s try to restart it:

>podman machine stop

Machine "podman-machine-default" stopped successfully

>podman machine start

Starting machine "podman-machine-default"

The operation timed out because a response was not received from the virtual machine or container.

Error code: Wsl/Service/CreateInstance/CreateVm/HCS_E_CONNECTION_TIMEOUT

Error: the WSL bootstrap script failed: command C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps\wsl.exe [-u root -d podman-machine-default /root/bootstrap] failed: exit status 0xffffffff

Looks like something is wrong with the VM. Lets remove it:

>podman machine rm podman-machine-default

The following files will be deleted:

C:\Users\<user>\.config\containers\podman\machine\wsl\podman-machine-default.json

C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Local\Temp\podman\podman-machine-default.sock

C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Local\Temp\podman\podman-machine-default-gvproxy.sock

C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Local\Temp\podman\podman-machine-default-api.sock

C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Local\Temp\podman\podman-machine-default.log

Are you sure you want to continue? [y/N] y

Logging out.

The operation has completed.

Once the VM is removed, we can try to recreate it:

>podman machine init

Looking up Podman Machine image at quay.io/podman/machine-os-wsl:5.3 to create VM

Getting image source signatures

Copying blob 54c816116e80 done   |

Copying config 44136fa355 done   |

Writing manifest to image destination

54c816116e80d74b8e638baf1fb37f3d6c4b6545f8c405d998169513766e1dc5

Extracting compressed file: podman-machine-default-amd64: done

Importing operating system into WSL (this may take a few minutes on a new WSL install)...

Importeren wordt uitgevoerd. Dit kan enkele minuten duren.

The operation timed out because a response was not received from the virtual machine or container.

Error code: Wsl/Service/RegisterDistro/CreateVm/HCS_E_CONNECTION_TIMEOUT

Error: the WSL import of guest OS failed: command C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps\wsl.exe [--import podman-machine-default C:\Users\<user>\.local\share\containers\podman\machine\wsl\wsldist\podman-machine-default C:\Users\<user>\.local\share\containers\podman\machine\wsl\podman-machine-default-amd64 --version 2] failed: exit status 0xffffffff

Still no luck! But what do you do if everything else failed…

A reboot!

We rebooted the machine and indeed the error magically disappeared.

On to the next issue…

More information

Error upgrading Podman

Podman 5.3.1 - Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: open \.ssh\known_hosts:

Podman Desktop–The WSL import of guest OS failed: exit status 0xffffffff

Popular posts from this blog

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...