Skip to main content

Docker Compose - listing workers for Build: failed to list workers: Unavailable

Docker Compose allows you to easily define and run multi-container applications. My team just 'inherited' a node.js with a PostgreSQL application. As this is not our main technology stack, debugging and running this through Docker Compose sounds like a perfect pit.

We already had a DOCKERFILE created for the Node.js app so the only thing left to do was create our Docker Compose file:

Nothing special. However, when we tried to start the containers through docker compose up, it failed with the following error message:

>docker compose up

[+] Building 0.0s (0/0)

listing workers for Build: failed to list workers: Unavailable: connection error: desc = "transport: Error while dialing unable to upgrade to h2c, received 404"

After some trial and error, we were able to pinpoint the issue to the 'build' part of the docker compose file:

services:

  app:

build: .

If we replaced the build context by a pre-created image instead everything worked. In Docker Compose, the build context is a crucial concept that defines the directory or URL containing the Dockerfile and other necessary files for building a Docker image. The build context can be specified in two main ways: as a single string defining a context path (as we did in the example above) or as a detailed build definition.

By why do we get this error?

It seems somewhat related to BuildKit.

So what is BuildKit?

BuildKit is a feature included with the Docker daemon that simplifies the process of building and packaging container images. It provides new functionality and improves the builds' performance.

Unfortunately for an unknown reason it didn’t want to work in combination with Docker Compose. The way we fixed it for this scenario is by falling back to the legacy builder. This can be done by setting the DOCKER_BUILDKIT environment variable to 0 before running docker compose up:

>SET DOCKER_BUILDKIT=0

>docker compose up

More information

Compose Build Specification | Docker Docs

BuildKit | Docker Docs

linux - RHEL7 docker-compose will not work "transport: Error while dialing unable to upgrade to h2c, received 404" - Stack Overflow

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...