Skip to main content

.NET 9 upgrade–notnull constraint

With the Christmas Holidays after us, I finally got some time to start upgrading some older .NET Core applications to .NET 9. First thing I noticed after upgrading is that I got some new warnings related to the ‘notnull’ constraint.

The ‘notnull’ constraint was introduced as part of the nullable reference types feature in C#.  The goal of nullable reference types was to solve the ‘million dollar mistake’ and help you to prevent common issue of null reference exceptions. They allow  to explicitly state whether a reference type variable can be null or not, helping to catch potential null dereferences at compile time.

The feature is in fact a combination of multiple elements all with the goal of avoiding unexpected null reference exceptions:

  • Nullable and Non-Nullable Reference Types:

    • Non-Nullable: If you declare a reference type without the ? suffix (e.g., string name), it is considered non-nullable. The compiler issues warnings if you try to assign a null value to it.

    • Nullable: If you declare a reference type with the ? suffix (e.g., string? name), it can hold a null value. The compiler warns you when you might dereference it without a null check.

  • Null-State Analysis: The compiler tracks the null-state of each variable, which can be either not-null or maybe-null. It issues warnings if there's a possibility of a null dereference.

  • Annotations and Attributes: You can use various attributes (like [NotNullWhen(false)]) and annotations to give the compiler more information about the nullability of parameters and return values in methods.

  • As part of this feature a new generic constraint was introduced, the ‘notnull’ constraint. This guarantees that the provided type is a non-nullable type. This can either be a non-nullable reference type or a non-nullable value type.

    Remark: As this feature was introduced already in C# 8.0, I think it is just a coincidence I noticed it only after upgrading to .NET 9. One extra reason to enable the ‘Treat warnings as errors’ flag…

    I got 2 places where I got this warning:

    ModuleExtensions.cs(83,137,83,144): warning CS8714: The type 'T' cannot be used as type parameter 'TKey' in the generic type or method 'Dictionary<TKey, TValue>'. Nullability of type argument 'T' doesn't match 'notnull' constraint.

    NoOpLogger.cs(15,24,15,34): warning CS8633: Nullability in constraints for type parameter 'TState' of method 'NoOpLogger.BeginScope<TState>(TState)' doesn't match the constraints for type parameter 'TState' of interface method 'ILogger.BeginScope<TState>(TState)'. Consider using an explicit interface implementation instead.

    Here is each time the original code and the fix:

    Original code:

    Fix:

    Original code:

    Fix:

    More information

    Nullable reference types - C# | Microsoft Learn

    The history of C# | Microsoft Learn

    Popular posts from this blog

    Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

    I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

    Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

    After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

    Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

    Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...