Skip to main content

Prevent breaking changes using Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.PublicApiAnalyzers

For one of my clients, I maintain a set of libraries that help to streamline the development of new applications in .NET Core. The functionality offered through these libraries follow the 'paved road' principle and help the development teams to fall in the pit of success. They are used by multiple development teams working on different projects.

As a library author, I don’t have full control on all the different ways these libraries are used so I have to be very conscious in avoiding breaking changes. In this post I want to share some details on how I try to manage and avoid breaking changes.

Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.PublicApiAnalyzers

The ‘magic’ solution I use to avoid or handle breaking changes is with the help of a specific Roslyn analyzer, the Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.PublicApiAnalyzers.

Let me explain how this analyzer works.

First add a package reference to Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.PublicApiAnalyzers to your project:

dotnet add package Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.PublicAnalyzers

This will add 2 extra files to your project:

  • PublicAPI.Shipped.txt
  • PublicApi.Unshipped.txt

When you now try to build your project, you get a RS0016 diagnostics on all your public APIs:

This warning helps you to be aware that a change is done in a public api so that you can take it into account in code reviews and pull requests (or look at a way to avoid introducing a breaking change).

You can now use the code fix feature to add the API to the PublicAPI.Unshipped.txt file:

Remark: In Visual Studio, you can apply the fix in one go for all changes.

If I have changes in this file, I know that a made a breaking change somewhere. This allows me to track these breaking changes in an effective and centralized way. 

It is up to you as a library author when you release a new version of your library to copy the changes from the PublicAPI.Unshipped.txt file to the PublicAPI.Shipped.txt file.

Remark: While preparing this post, I stumbled over an alternative solution, PublicApiGenerator, mentioned in a blog post by Andrew Lock. If you have experience using this package, please let me now. 

More information

The paved road

NuGet Gallery | Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.PublicApiAnalyzers 3.3.4

Preventing breaking changes in public APIs with PublicApiGenerator

NuGet Gallery | PublicApiGenerator 11.3.0

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...