Skip to main content

ASP.NET Core Scope Validation

While preparing a training about .NET Core I stumbled over a feature I was unaware it existed in ASP.NET Core: Scope Validation.

One of the nice things inside ASP.NET Core is that it has built-in support for Dependency Injection.

Service lifetime

When registering your dependencies you have 3 service lifetimes to choose from:

  • Transient: Transient lifetime services are created each time they're requested. This lifetime works best for lightweight, stateless services.
  • Scoped: Scoped lifetime services are created once per request.
  • Singleton: Singleton lifetime services are created the first time they're requested (or when ConfigureServices is run and an instance is specified with the service registration). Every subsequent request uses the same instance.

Simple so far. The problem is that you can shoot yourself in the foot when you start combining multiple lifetimes in the same object tree. 

For example when using a scoped service in a middleware, and you inject it via constructor injection, the service will behave as a singleton as the service is injected only once at the construction of the middleware. (Note: Inject the scoped service into the Invoke or InvokeAsync method as a solution)

Another example where it can go wrong is when trying to resolve a scoped service from a singleton. This can lead to an incorrect state in your application.

To prevent this kind of problems from happening, Microsoft introduced Scope validation.

Scope validation

If you are using the default WebHost builder scope validation is already enabled as one of the steps when executing CreateDefaultBuilder. Behind the scenes it sets ServiceProviderOptions.ValidateScopes to true if the app's environment is Development.

When ValidateScopes is set to true, the default service provider performs checks to verify that:

  • Scoped services aren't directly or indirectly resolved from the root service provider.
  • Scoped services aren't directly or indirectly injected into singletons.

The root service provider is created when BuildServiceProvider is called. The root service provider's lifetime corresponds to the app/server's lifetime when the provider starts with the app and is disposed when the app shuts down.

Scoped services are disposed by the container that created them. If a scoped service is created in the root container, the service's lifetime is effectively promoted to singleton because it's only disposed by the root container when app/server is shut down. Validating service scopes catches these situations.

Remark: if you want to validate scopes for all environment, you can configure the ServiceProviderOptions with UseDefaultServiceProvider on the host builder:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...