Skip to main content

ASP.NET Core - IOptionsMonitor vs IOptionsSnapshot

While preparing some training material about ASP.NET Core, I was wondering about the difference between IOptionsMonitor and IOptionsSnapshot. In contrast to IOptions allow both interfaces to track configuration changes during the lifetime of your application.

However, internally both interfaces are constructed completely different; IOptionsMonitor is registered in DI container as singleton, it has a CurrentValue property and is capable of detecting changes through OnChange event subscription. On the other hand, IOptionsSnapshot is registered as scoped, has a Value property and also have a change detection capability by reading the last options for each request, but it doesn't have the OnChange event.

So what’s the point of having 2 interfaces with completely different signatures when both achieve the same goal; picking up configuration changes at runtime?

The difference between the two (and this also explains the different implementation approach) is that IOptionsSnapshot guarantees that you have the same configuration values during a single request(explaining the scoped lifetime). IOptionsMonitor picks up every change immediately meaning that if the configuration value is read multiple times in a request, it can return different values.

As a general rule, you should prefer IOptionsSnaphot above IOptionsMonitor.

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...