Skip to main content

Structured output with Ollama

I talked about Structured Output before in the context of Semantic Kernel. Structured Outputs is a feature that ensures the model will always generate responses that follow a supplied JSON Schema, so you can process the responses in automated fashion without worrying about getting invalid JSON back.

Recently support for Structured Output was announced by Ollama. In this post I want to show you how you can use this in combination with OllamaSharp, the C# client for Ollama.

Using Structured Ouput in OllamaSharp

Remark: Make sure you have latest Ollama version running on your local machine before you continue.

  • Add the OllamaSharp client to your project:

dotnet add package OllamaSharp

  • Now let’s first define our response model:
  • Afterwards we need to initiate a new OllamaSharp client instance:
  • We create a new request object.
    • Notice that we specify a JSON schema object based on the Recipe model we created earlier
  • If we now invoke the application we get a JSON response back in the provided format:

The full example can be found here: wullemsb/SemanticKernelStructuredOutput at OllamaClient

What about using the Semantic Kernel Ollama connector?

At the moment of writing this blog post, I couldn’t get the Structured Output working when combining Semantic Kernel and Ollama.

I explicitly referenced the correct OllamaSharp version:

And used the Ollama connector:

But when calling the api, I still got a response back in an unstructured format:

More information

Semantic Kernel - Structured output

awaescher/OllamaSharp: The easiest way to use the Ollama API in .NET

Support for 'Structured outputs' · awaescher/OllamaSharp · Discussion #152

Structured outputs · Ollama Blog

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...