Skip to main content

Semantic Kernel - Structured output

One of the challenges when integrating a large language model into your backend processes is that the response you get back is non-deterministic. This is not a big problem if you only want to output the response as text, but it can be a challenge to process the response in an automated fashion.

Prompting for JSON

Of course you can use prompt engineering to ask the LLM to return the response as JSON and even provide an example to steer the LLM, but still it can happen that the JSON you get back is not formatted correctly.

Here is a possible prompt:

A trick that also can help as mentioned in the Anthropic documentation is to prefill the response with a part of the JSON message.

JSON mode

Although the techniques above will certainly help, they are not fool proof. A first improvement on this approach was the introduction of JSON mode in the OpenAI API. When JSON mode is turned on, the model's output is ensured to be valid JSON, except for some edge cases that are described in the documentation. 

To use this technique you need to update the execution settings of Semantic Kernel:

Structured output

With structured output we can take this approach one step further and specify an exact JSON schema that we want to get back.

We have 2 options when using this approach. Either we specify the schema directly:

Or we let Semantic Kernel automatically generate the model based on a provided type:

Remark: Structured output is only supported in the more recent language models.

More information

Entity extraction with Azure OpenAI Structured Outputs | Microsoft Community Hub

Using JSON Schema for Structured Output in .NET for OpenAI Models | Semantic Kernel

Prefill Claude's response for greater output control – Anthropic

Structured Outputs - OpenAI API

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...