Skip to main content

Semantic Kernel - Multi agent systems

Yesterday I talked about the new agent abstraction in Semantic Kernel and how it can simplify the steps required to build your own AI agent.  But what could be better than having one agent? Multiple agents of course!


And that is exactly what was recently introduced as a preview in Semantic Kernel.

As explained in this blog post, there are multiple ways that multiple agents can work together. The simplest way is as a group chat where multiple agents can talk back-and-forth with each other. To avoid that these agents get stuck in a loop this is combined with a custom termination strategy that specifies when the conversation is over.

Here is a small example.

I start with the default Semantic Kernel configuration to create a kernel instance:

Now I define the instructions for the different agents and create them:

Remark: Notice that I can use different kernels with different models if I want to.

To make sure that the conversation is ended I need to specify a TerminationStrategy:

As a last step I need to bring the multiple agents together in a group chat:

Now I can start the conversation by providing some input:

That’s it!

The full example:

More information

Exploring Multi-Agent AI Systems (microsoft.com)

Introducing enterprise multi-agent support in Semantic Kernel | Semantic Kernel (microsoft.com)

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...